Please pardon me while I rant a bit...talk amongst yourselves
posted 23 March 2004, Tuesday
Well, what's this about then? Seems I'm fed up with the Orthodox (this happens from time to time - it's like being fed up with a friend you love, so bear with me). Those who have read my stuff from time to time know that I actually have nothing against anything truly Orthodox. I attend an Orthodox Church, I read the Fathers, I've come within a hair's breadth of joining the Orthodox Church once and for all. I'm an inveterate defender of icons and their veneration; got no problem here with saints and feasts and fasts - I want it all, dammit. And the Panagia, Mary, the Theotokos - don't even get me started. But there is one problem, and it keeps coming up, and quite frankly I'm sick of it. Seems our Orthodox friends can't seem to commend the life of the Church and the mind of the Fathers without reminding us of how utterly deficient everything in our Protestant past is. Now, this would be fine except that, usually, they don't know what the hell they're talking about.
You see, it's like this. Many Orthodox apologists, in order to make their point, will set up some imaginary 'Protestantism,' and then proceed to show how superior their 'experience of the Church' is to this straw man. There is usually just enough truth in their picture of the Other to make it plausible, but this can't disguise for long the simple fact that their 'portrait' is usually false to the experience of most Magisterial Protestants. In fact, it seems the favored tactic is to cobble together something of a mishmash of Darbyite nonsense, some Dispensationalist Tent Meeting babble, a bit of the ol' Once Saved Always Saved, and Sola Scriptura à la Fundistical Propositionalism, and call it 'Protestant.' Granted, there are occasional nuances to this. For instance, some might actually know that Lutherans believe, teach and confess that the Body and Blood of Christ are Really Present in the bread and wine of the Eucharist, or that Calvin (following Augustine, following Paul) grounded his understanding of Perseverance in the faithfulness and righteousness of a Triune God who will not lie, and whose purposes can't be frustrated. Still, this sort of nuance is rare enough.
What's worse, many Orthodox (and not just folks on the web; I'm talking about some of the finest minds in Orthodoxy, like Lossky and Ouspensky, not to mention John Romanides, who's simply an intellectual fascist) use the most egregious mis-readings of the likes of Augustine, Anselm, Luther, et. al., in their quest to drive out the Manichaean demon of the 'West.' Never mind that Augustine and Gregory of Nyssa, just to take an example, are most similar in their Trinitarian teachings, or that Anselm didn't really teach 'Anselmic Justice,' with its two dashes of penal suffering for every spoonful of retribution. And it's usually the most embarassingly wrong-headed passages of these Westerners that are lifted out of context and made to stand for the whole damn western world, as though it's Augustine's fault, say, that a bunch of Carolingian ninnies misread Nicea II and likewise forgot there was anything good in Greek and Syriac. In this xenophobic fervor, the very roots of what came to be the Reformation are not attacked and refuted (which would require honorable labor, attention to texts and traditions, experience of the life of various communions other than the Orthodox Church), as pilloried and villified.
So, here's the Big Church, with so much to teach us, and what do we find? Insults at every turn. And if we have the temerity to raise a question or two about this, if we're scandalized at all, then we're told that we're 'thinking with our heads, not our hearts.' Yes, it's true, don't you know, that if only we lived a more holistic life, Like They Do, we wouldn't be scandalized. It's not as if they could possibly do anything wrong. Heaven forfend! And you know, it's only because they want it easy that folks have the nerve to remain Lutheran or Calvinist, or even orthodox Anglican. Because we all know it's much easier to be, say, a devout Dutch Calvinist than a polemic spewing Orthodox.
Now, let me be clear. It's not as though most heirs of the Reformation know anything about the Orthodox. Seems they're just Roman Catholics without the Pope, or something like that. Nor do most Reformation folk give a damn about the Orthodox they do occasionally hear about. Which is as much to say that this all goes both ways. Nor do I assert that there aren't differences, even enormous differences, between the Orthodox life and that which you find in most other communions. Within the Orthodox Church, for instance, there is a weird and wonderful unity of liturgical and sacramental life that can't be matched by those institutional or confessional attempts to force unity which so weigh down most other communions. But to get at what is really going on there requires more than the vain repetition of what someone else said about a people he didn't even understand.
I guess what really tears it for me, though, is that many Orthodox are so damned triumphalistic that they can't even consider that the very methods they use to commend the Mind of the Church can do more harm than good. I've even encountered more than one convert who had bought into all the crap laid on 'em, when in fact they really didn't understand the tradition they left all that well to begin with. How many actually fell in love with the Living Tradition of the Church, with its Paschal center and evangelical freedom, and how many wanted something they perceived as 'dark' and 'mystical,' something that would make up for the church which had Let Them Down by going all liberal, or whatever. There's no way to tell, but I've had my doubts.
None of this, however, can even be uttered. Can't throw doubt on their methods, can't suggest that they might learn a thing or two from someone else, oh no. Since they are the True Church they can Do No Wrong. That they are the One Church from which all have somehow fallen away is a reasonable claim. Still, there's no collapsing history, no controling what the Holy Spirit can do in all those oh so defective communions which are filled, by and large, not with wanton heretics who are glad to be rid of the shackles of the Patriarch, but simply Christians who were born in the Presbyterian, Lutheran, or whatever, communion, and who are attempting to remain faithful to the Gospel in their own flawed way. Which, come to think of it, sounds an awful lot like any gaggle of Orthodox Christians in any particular parish. If the Orthodox really do have so much to offer (I believe this), they needn't take swipes at all these other groups, bash the 'West' (a pitiful enough endeavor as there no longer is a West to speak of), or otherwise polemicise themselves into a hole they can't escape.
Though this has been a bit angry, and maybe harsh, I hope my Orthodox friends who read this blog, and others who are sympathetic to the Orthodox Church, will see this as an admonition, not a condemnation. This is really a plea for a better way, and there are those who are opening that way even now. Do not continue down this road of triumphalistic blindness, if for no other reason than the pain it causes those who love you.